-= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
Moderators: Board of Directors, Command
Re: -= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
i get what youre saying porco, i feel the same way. spotting/tracking targets at medium distances is difficult.
Re: -= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
The guys with early access state that while they frequently had to use to zoom function to spot and keep an eye on contact, it is now much, much easier. We'll have to see ourselves off course, but its a good indication.
-
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:15 pm
Re: -= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
I finally finished the first build of a Normandy44 public missions.
feel free to check it out!
feel free to check it out!
I had been telling Hitler for over a year, since my first flight in an Me-262, that only Focke Wulf Fw-190 fighter production should continue in conventional aircraft, to discontinue the Me-109, which was outdated, and to focus on building a massive jet-fighter force. - Galland
Any idiot could fly a Spitfire, but it took a lot of training to fly a 109. - Gerald Stapleton
Re: -= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
Spotting is still dogshit medium to far distances. But its a little easier to track a fight your in closer than in 1.5
-
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:15 pm
Re: -= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
I finished a radar script for it, so bombers with a radar guidance routine for interceptors will be introduced tomorrow.
I made a poll on the ED forums about the "Label Mod".
https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php? ... ost3185108
I made a poll on the ED forums about the "Label Mod".
https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php? ... ost3185108
I had been telling Hitler for over a year, since my first flight in an Me-262, that only Focke Wulf Fw-190 fighter production should continue in conventional aircraft, to discontinue the Me-109, which was outdated, and to focus on building a massive jet-fighter force. - Galland
Any idiot could fly a Spitfire, but it took a lot of training to fly a 109. - Gerald Stapleton
- PorcoRosso86
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:44 am
Re: -= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
I wrote my opinion on ED forum, but I wanted to write here also my compliments, I like the server very much, and personally think that it is a next level then the others WW2 server on DCS.
Keep on!
Keep on!
-
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:15 pm
Re: -= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
Due to performance drops with AIs i had to remove the Bombers.
I had been telling Hitler for over a year, since my first flight in an Me-262, that only Focke Wulf Fw-190 fighter production should continue in conventional aircraft, to discontinue the Me-109, which was outdated, and to focus on building a massive jet-fighter force. - Galland
Any idiot could fly a Spitfire, but it took a lot of training to fly a 109. - Gerald Stapleton
-
- Posts: 1580
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 2:33 pm
- Location: Adelaide, AUSTRALIA [̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅]
Re: -= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
because dcs is shitIronJockel wrote:Due to performance drops with AIs i had to remove the Bombers.
1
Speak to me about joining the ACG Pilots Union
Speak to me about joining the ACG Pilots Union
-
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:15 pm
Re: -= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
I had been telling Hitler for over a year, since my first flight in an Me-262, that only Focke Wulf Fw-190 fighter production should continue in conventional aircraft, to discontinue the Me-109, which was outdated, and to focus on building a massive jet-fighter force. - Galland
Any idiot could fly a Spitfire, but it took a lot of training to fly a 109. - Gerald Stapleton
Re: -= ACG WW2 Server (EU) =-
And BOS is even shitierKildren wrote:because dcs is shitIronJockel wrote:Due to performance drops with AIs i had to remove the Bombers.